"richard.opa...@jboss.com" wrote : | * deployer stages have to be comparable | Why? That's why they are called stages and they are already comparable - how else do you think they fit into our state machine. ;-)
"richard.opa...@jboss.com" wrote : | * deployers have to be sorted on deployers chain retrieval (i.e. in method protected synchronized List getDeployersList(String stageName)) | Why? Based on what? This would be complete waste of time/performance. "richard.opa...@jboss.com" wrote : | * sorting agorithm have to take stages, inputs, outputs and relative order into account | Why/how stages? All the rest is already taken into account. "richard.opa...@jboss.com" wrote : | * different sorting algorithm have to be implemented (domino is wrong because two deployers are not comparable in general) Sure. But re-read my previous post: "alesj" wrote : | If we have to resort to name comparison it either means: | * the order of how we process attachments doesn't matter | * you are describing/ordering your deployers wrong == lack of info | View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4239954#4239954 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4239954 _______________________________________________ jboss-user mailing list jboss-user@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
