Yeah, I don't buy this "implicit dependencies" business.  The beauty of the MC 
deployer architecture is that when you deploy stuff, you can make dependencies 
which are implicit (as far as the user sees) translate to explicit dependencies 
before the container even sees the deployment.

As for "depending" on JNDI, I think that should always translate into a real 
explicit dependency, which is filled by a special bean deployment that 
represents the JNDI binding.  These special deployments can be implicitly 
created by the EJB and JCA deployers, much like how I bind logging handlers to 
logger categories.

I think that the value of having a highly efficient (and simple) dependency 
resolution algorithm will far, far outweigh its support for edge cases that can 
be easily implemented in other ways.

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4244482#4244482

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4244482
_______________________________________________
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-user@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user

Reply via email to