I've scanned the patch, thanks. I've just one concern, ie. whether it's a bit too aggressive rewriting a "file://foo-bar" address with one using http protocol, as theoretically that might refer to a jms binding. So you might want to enhance the patch a bit scanning the model, getting the binding corresponding to the address being analysed and verifying the soap:binding in use before rewriting "file" to "http(s)". Btw, besides fixing this which is good in anycase, did you try providing an address without procotol (simply "replace-me" for instance) in your wsdl as a workaround?
View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4264983#4264983 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4264983 _______________________________________________ jboss-user mailing list jboss-user@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
