User development,

A new message was posted in the thread "Reviewing jbossws installation":

http://community.jboss.org/message/527900#527900

Author  : Alessio Soldano
Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/alessio.sold...@jboss.com

Message:
--------------------------------------------------------------
As you might have noticed, some things are changing recently in the way JBossWS 
is installed in the AS.
* The jbossws-common, jbossws-framework and jbossws-spi have been moved out of 
the deployer dir to common/lib, see .
* The services / factories impl declaration have been moved to descriptor only 
jars in the native stack, see https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBWS-2921.
* We have a jira (https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBWS-2923) for moving all 
the remaining libs of jbossws to common/lib
* Richard correctly pointed out we might also want to move the jbossws-console 
to common/deploy.
Generally speaking, given the direction we've been moving recently, I think we 
might want to re-think the idea of jbossws install process to a given server 
profile / configuration (default, all, standard, etc.) only. Considering the 
issues we've had in the past with users not correctly deploying to the profile 
they want, the requirements I had when working on the EAP 5 CXF TP, the current 
solution with multiple *-deploy.conf files (which is not that good), the fact 
client and common/lib dirs are shared, etc.. there's probably no reason any 
more for installing to a given profile only. At least that's more error prone 
than before. So we might want to always deploy to every profile meant for 
including webservices functionalities.
Do you have any comment on this? Otherwise I'm creating a jira for this.

--------------------------------------------------------------

To reply to this message visit the message page: 
http://community.jboss.org/message/527900#527900


_______________________________________________
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-user@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user

Reply via email to