Hello,
I am trying to come up with a pattern for initializing the Seam Actor for jBPM
in my system. There is no login action in my system - we're authenticating
using a custom Tomcat Valve (integration with an enterprise SSO system). So I
tried to use the @Unwrap approach here:
| @Name("initjBPMActor")
| public class InitjBPMActor {
|
| @Logger Log log;
|
| @In
| private Principal userPrincipal;
|
| @Unwrap
| public Actor getActor() {
| // get an instance of Actor, set it's id using the
userPrincipal.name value
| Actor actor = Actor.instance();
| actor.setId(userPrincipal.getName());
| log.info("getActor() : Actor -> "+actor);
| // todo - remove logging...
| return actor;
| }
| }
|
I have a SFSB in which the Actor is @In'jected. When I invoke a method that
uses the actor, it doesn't seem that getActor() is ever called (I don't see the
log.info() message in my logging output). Furthermore, I think that this
attempt to @Unwrap the Actor is causing problems with Seam, because once I
attempt to invoke a method in my SFSB which does nothing but log.info()'s, I do
not see output of the log.info()'s and the test case appears to fail (SeamTest).
If it's not possible to use Actor with @Unwrap (because it gets special
handling by Seam), then is it possible to specify that the Actor ALWAYS gets
its id from userPrincipal.name? (i.e. - some kind of default strategy - maybe
it's a good idea to provide a few different strategies in the framework to pick
from, including a custom strategy).
Thanks,
Brad Smith
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3983004#3983004
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3983004
_______________________________________________
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-user@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
