Not sure why you would have to set that manually, if the page already has the contentType attribute set in the page directive.
What I've noticed is that the JSPs that fail to render properly have only: <%@ page contentType="text/html;charset=UTF-8" language="java" %> in them with respect to content type and character encoding. The files that DO render correctly, have the same: <%@ page contentType="text/html;charset=UTF-8" language="java" %> as well as: <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"/> in the source of the page. In the case where the page has the <meta http=equiv tag, the response is received at mod_jk with the correct HTTP headers and the meta tag removed from the page (by JBoss/Tomcat?) and the page is rendered correctly. In the case where the page only has the JSP page directive for contentType, there is no HTTP header for Content-Type seen (by mod_jk) and is, apparently, tagged with the default Content-Type when a header is not found -- text/plain -- presumably by Apache on the way out. A) Why is the JSP directive not sufficient to generate the HTTP Content-Type header or who is dropping/ignoring/losing it? B) Isn't including the meta http-equiv tag in addition to setting the content type in the JSP redundant? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4009053#4009053 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4009053 _______________________________________________ jboss-user mailing list jboss-user@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
