"bsmithjj" wrote : One comment on the google gadget thingy - I have nothing 
against a google-gadget portlet or add-on module, but I really think that JBoss 
Portal would do better if it was a delivered as a basic Portal 'engine' with a 
lot of the bells and whistles available as easy-drop-in add ons.  
Unfortunately, a lot of the bells and whistles (such as a google-gadget 
portlet) are simply lumped into the basic portal - making the whole product 
complex, hard to document, and fragile at times.  
  | Splitting the Portal into logical pieces allows each piece to evolve 
independently - most likely the core engine won't change too much because the 
fundamental building blocks are a JSR168 portlet container plus the paging and 
customization system.
  | 

Again all the bells and whistles are totally pluggable.
Look into jboss-portal.sar ou have several packages, remove what you don't want.
You don't want the google widgets ? Delete widget.war, everything related to it 
will be removed. You don't like the CMS ? remove portal-cms.war. You don't want 
the test pages and news portlets ? Remove portal-samples.war...
If we don't put it as default noone see that we have it.

What is interesting about Google widget is to show you that you can integrate 
other kind of stuff (Content-types). Out of the box we show you that you can 
put in a window: A JSR-168 portlet, a CMS resource, a Google widget, the 
content of a file, *Your content type*...

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4047099#4047099

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4047099
_______________________________________________
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-user@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user

Reply via email to