Tapestry has some advantages over JSF. One of them is performance. AFAIK it compiles code against bean code so no reflection overhead + more errors can be discovered at compile time compared to facelets. JSF performance is one of the issues which prevents its wider adoption. JSF also requires much more memory on server side.
Tapestry 5 seems to be major rewrite of tapestry so use annotations, etc. So I wonder in which applications it would make sense to use it vs Seam/JSF combo. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4072575#4072575 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4072575 _______________________________________________ jboss-user mailing list jboss-user@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
