Here are some results of performance testing: With the code I've posted in this thread (I've modified it to put 100 rows, 100 columns, 100 items in dropdowns).
Rendering table using JSP $ time curl http://localhost:8080/TestJSP/testTable.jsp > foo.jsp | % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Curr. | Dload Upload Total Current Left Speed | 100 49.4M 0 49.4M 0 0 6025k 0 --:--:-- 0:00:08 --:--:-- 3884k | | real 0m9.566s | user 0m0.124s | sys 0m0.765s Rendering table using Seam/JSF $ time curl http://localhost:8080/Table/testTable.seam > foo.seam | % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Curr. | Dload Upload Total Current Left Speed | 100 55.1M 0 55.1M 0 0 1055k 0 --:--:-- 0:00:53 --:--:-- 756k | | real 0m53.694s | user 0m0.343s | sys 0m0.671s JSP rendering took 9.5 seconds JSF rendering took 53 seconds I've made many runs with JSP consistently outperforming JSF by 5 times. Tests were done on HP-A1130N PC. I was monitoring memory usage (no excessive swapping) JSF application is seam-gen generated (server side state saving, standard configuration), JBoss from RedHat IDE. These results are consistent with what I'm observing in our QA environment. For similar table pages which would render in 1 sec we are getting responses in around 5 sec. So performance of rendering tables is not sufficient. Regards View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4086413#4086413 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4086413 _______________________________________________ jboss-user mailing list jboss-user@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
