> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Coleman
> Sent: 04 April 2001 16:47
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] ECperf project
>
>
> >
> > Probably the most important database servers from a promotional point of
> > view would be DB2/400, Oracle 8i, Sybase and M$ SQL Server.
> >
>
> Agreed. The choice of DB, and it's configuration, will dramatically
> impact ECperf results.
>
> Here are the priorities the way I see them:
>
> 1) Get ECperf running. Somewhere. period.
> 2) Get it running with JBoss
> 3) Use it internally to monitor impact of modifications to
> JBoss sources.
> 4) Provide JBoss deployment to allow users to measure JBoss
> performance.
>
> According to the ECperf license, we can't "promote" based on the results.
> The best we can do is provide a simple framework to allow users
> to produce
> their own benchmark results. This is what a sophisticated user (our kind
> of user) would want to do anyhow.
>
> Cloudscape will work fine in steps 1-3.
Except that often the different DB engines will often demand different
optimisations. Nope, we need a representative set of DB engines to make (3)
worth doing **in the long run**. (i.e. to do it really well)
At least add Interbase and Oracle. They can likely run on our JBoss server
machine - using the _free_ Oracle Linux developer license (is it still
free?). I'd like to say add MSSQL Server but I guess it's up to Win2k'ers
like me to provide the results on a regular basis...
>
> Although it is a big issue, we can easily postpone the problems
> of dealing
> with the big, expensive DB's until later in the project.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> JBoss-user mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
>
_______________________________________________
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
