Just look in the header to any message on this list (view message source) -
instructions are in there.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Pilot, Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 12:05 PM
Subject: [JBoss-user] unsubscribe


>
>
>
> Jules, do you kow the url for unscribing to this mailing list?  I'm
> getting a ton of messages at work!!  Need to change destination to home.
>
>
> Thanks, steve
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Julian Gosnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 4:59 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Jetty vs. Tomcat
>
>
> This sounds like the ENC stuff.
>
> I am putting it into JBossJetty at the moment, expect
> it in the next release along with a complete
> integration of all Jetty JMX subcomponents.
>
> ETA - two or three weeks...
>
> Jules
>
> --- Jim Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Actually, I
> tried Jetty (as part of the jBoss 2.2.1
> > bundle) just the other
> > day. It installed fine but when I deployed my EAR I
> > got a bunch of errors
> > complaining about JNDI.
> >
> > When I ran my app, I got a bunch of maning
> > exceptions. I have not had time
> > to look into this further, but it did make me wonder
> > if Jetty is fully
> > intergrated, like Tomcat is. I would have expected
> > the very same EAR to run
> > just the same under either Jetty or Tomcat...
> >
> > Jim
> >
> > --On Friday, April 20, 2001 1:50 AM -0500 danch
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Alternatively, Tomcat is the reference
> > implementation. Jetty is
> > > lightweight and fast.
> > >
> > > The only other thing is that (judging from traffic
> > analysis of these
> > > mailing lists) Integration of Tomcat with JBoss is
> > better tested. (Jetty
> > > users, feel free to argue)
> > >
> > > -danch
> > >
> > > Alvin Yap wrote:
> > >
> > >> Tomcat is more robust and extensible.  Jetty is
> > lightweight and fast.
> > >>
> > >> Alvin
> > >>
> > >> Jason Dillon wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>> Does anyone have any opinions as to which
> > contain is more robust,
> > >>> easier to use and such?
> > >>>
> > >>> --jason
> > >>>
> > >>> _______________________________________________
> > >>> JBoss-user mailing list
> > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>>
> >
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> JBoss-user mailing list
> > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>
> >
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > JBoss-user mailing list
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> >
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
> >
> >
> >
> > ********************************************
> > I shall be telling this with a sigh
> > Somewhere ages and ages hence:
> > Two roads diverged in a wood, and I -
> > I took the one less traveled by,
> > And that has made all the difference.
> >
> > - Robert Frost, 1916
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > JBoss-user mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk
> or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie
>
> _______________________________________________
> JBoss-user mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
>
> _______________________________________________
> JBoss-user mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
>


_______________________________________________
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user

Reply via email to