In my ejb-jar.xml, I define a number of security roles, for example:
<security-role>
<description>All users with read access to instance
1</description>
<role-name>Instance1Reader</role-name>
</security-role>
In other application servers that I have worked with, this role-name is
a "logical" role name, which in turn must be mapped to a "physical"
principle in the app server specific xml. For example, in
weblogic-ejb-jar.xml, I would specify:
<security-role-assignment>
<role-name>Instance1Reader</role-name>
<principal-name>guest</principal-name>
</security-role-assignment>
However, unless I am missing something, it seems that jboss.xml does not
provide an equivalent mapping, and that jBoss expects the role-name from
the ejb-jar.xml file itself to be the actual principle name. Is this
correct?
Thanks,
Dale
================================
Dale V. Georg
Technical Manager
Indus Consultancy Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(201) 261-3100 x229
================================
_______________________________________________
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
