I agree that timely and full suport for EJB 2.0 and Corba (RMI/IIOP) are
critical for the eventual success and acceptance of JBoss.
Ivan
----- Original Message -----
From: "Burkhard Vogel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 6:09 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] The State of EJB2.0 in JBoss
> Hi,
> How about the required Corba (RMI/IIOP) support??
> Burkhard
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Hunter Hillegas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Jim Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "JBoss 2"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 2:26 AM
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] The State of EJB2.0 in JBoss
>
>
> > Local interfaces? I guess that's not too big of a deal since the code
can
> > easily be changed later...
> >
> > Hunter
> >
> > > From: Jim Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 20:17:41 -0400
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Cc: Hunter Hillegas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] The State of EJB2.0 in JBoss
> > >
> > > Hi Hunter...
> > >
> > > --On Wednesday, May 30, 2001 10:23 AM -0700 Hunter Hillegas
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Am I correct that JBoss currently does support EJB1.1 + MDB?
> > >
> > > Yes, this is correct.
> > >
> > > So between MVC Soft and jBoss MDBs, what are you missing?
> > >
> > > Jim
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > JBoss-user mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> JBoss-user mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
_______________________________________________
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
