I compared the performance of this new implementation against what I checked in on December 5th 2005 and don't see much difference:
December 5th changes: 1. Calling add 2000 times in a loop took 39.816 seconds 2 Performing 2000 iterations in a loop took 39.329 seconds With the new implementation changes: 1. Calling add 2000 times in a loop took 38.887 seconds 2. Performing 2000 iterations in a loop took 43.188 seconds Prior to my changes on December 5th, performance was lower. I do like the new implementation and thought that performance would be better than it was but it doesn't seem any better than the December 5th change. If anyone would like the test case code, let me know (I'll check it in enventually, just not ready yet). Scott View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3920840#3920840 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3920840 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ JBoss-user mailing list JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user