Hi, I have a @Remote & @Local interface | @Remote | @Local | public interface IMyIfc { ... } | SLSB that implements the interface
| @Stateless | public class MyClass implements MyIfc { ... } | and another SLSB where MyClass is injected | @Stateless | public class AnotherClass implements IAnotherIfc { | @EJB | IMyIfc myIfc; | | ... | } | I would expect that local proxy is injected into AnotherClass.myIfc, however EJB container injects remote proxy. My question is - what is the reason for preferring remote over local? I did not find anything about this issue in spec... I suggest changing the order, so that call-by-reference behaviour is preferred to call-by-value. Thanks, Petr View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3954299#3954299 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3954299 Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ JBoss-user mailing list JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user