Hi,
I have a @Remote & @Local interface

  | @Remote
  | @Local
  | public interface IMyIfc { ... }
  | 
SLSB that implements the interface

  | @Stateless
  | public class MyClass implements MyIfc { ... }
  | 
and another SLSB where MyClass is injected

  | @Stateless
  | public class AnotherClass implements IAnotherIfc {
  |   @EJB
  |   IMyIfc myIfc;
  | 
  |   ...
  | }
  | 

I would expect that local proxy is injected into AnotherClass.myIfc, however 
EJB container injects remote proxy. My question is - what is the reason for 
preferring remote over local? I did not find anything about this issue in 
spec... I suggest changing the order, so that call-by-reference behaviour is 
preferred to call-by-value.

Thanks,
Petr

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3954299#3954299

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3954299

Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
JBoss-user mailing list
JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user

Reply via email to