Brian Towles,
How do you have this working?  What are you doing differently than everyone 
else that allows your session bean to call another bean on another server?

I get a Caused by: java.io.NotSerializableException: 
tyrex.tm.impl.TransactionImpl

Also see forumn thread:
http://www.jboss.org/forums/thread.jsp?forum=61&thread=21023&message=3740554&q=tyrex#3740554

Josh (Java Guru) Davis

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Brian Towles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 10:01 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] MarshalException for Remote Invocation (610392)
>
>
>
>Tyrex has makes use of the OTS (jts corba stuff) and has a
>TransactionPropogationContext (TPC) which wraps the OTS propogation
>context.  The OTS has XA resources as well as Xids that are
>externalizable.  So yes this is done by the tyrex plugin specifically. It 
>takes the TPC on an import and converts it to a Transaction.
>
>As well on the reverse takes a Transaction and coverts it to a TPC which
>can be serialized.
>
>The JBoss implementaion allows the TPC to be added to any marshalled
>invocation.  So the capability to do distributed transactions is already
>in there    just not for the the default JBoss transaction manager.  It
>actually uses a TransactionImpl as a TPC.
>
>
>Just FYI the change to the storage location for the Transaction in the
>MarshalledInvocation seems to work.  I am currently able to do
>distributed transactions with the tyrex plugin under 3.0.1.  I have not
>run the testsuite yet  but will  shortly.
>
>
>Thanks
>-=Brian
>
>On Tue, 2002-09-17 at 06:37, David Jencks wrote:
> > I haven't looked at the code, I've just been thinking about how to make 
>the
> > jboss tm distributed.
> > > First, until the jboss tm is distributed, it seems to me that problems
> > invoking an ejb on another server from inside a tx using the jboss tm 
>are
> > appropriate, since the tx can't be propagated.
> > > Using tyrex or the future enhanced jboss tm, I believe there has to be 
>an
> > XAResource somewhere near the remote invoker or proxy that gets the tm 
>to
> > produce an xid branch for the tx on the other server.  IMO the Xid is 
>what
> > should get serialized and sent over.  I've been thinking that a client
> > interceptor would be the place for the XAResource.  On the other side,
> > something needs to take the xid and create a transaction on the 2nd 
>server,
> > associated with this xid. The "something" is implemented in jboss 4 in 
>the
> > jca 1.5 support.
> > > WIth Tyrex, I imagine they must have code that does this stuff.  Does 
>the
> > tyrex integration code appear to be trying to do any of this?
> > > Thanks
> > david jencks
> > > > On 2002.09.17 03:18:15 -0400 Brian Towles wrote:
> > > Howdy all
> > > > > Repeating what be bug said.. (just for frame of reference)
> > > > > --------------
> > > A Marshaling Exception is being thrown the remote
> > > invoker when any remote EJB function is called
> > > (inter-jboss).  Even when using Tyrex as a transaction
> > > manager.
> > > > > This is being caused by the Transaction Implmentation
> > > being placed in the MarshalledInvocation's
> > > as_is_payload Map.  This is preventing any  remote
> > > invocation because the TransactionImpl for both jboss
> > > and tyrex are not serializable.  > > > > For a remote invocation it is 
>my understanding that
> > > only the TransactionPropogationContext (TPC) is what is
> > > needed to migrate the transaction for remote
> > > invocation.  The TPC is being placed in the in the
> > > MarshaledInvocation correctly.
> > > ------------------
> > > > > Ive been hunting this one down for a while and I would like some 
>advice
> > > on what a proper fix would be.  > > > > Would simply putting it into 
>the transient_payload keep things working
> > > internally?  Theoretically it should then not be marshaled and the TPC
> > > should be the transaction propagation mechanism for remote.
> > > > > Right now I'm looking for a quick solution cause I have a deadline 
>to
> > > meet. (don't we all).
> > > > > Any hints would help
> > > > > Thanks
> > > -=Brian
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 
>-------------------------------------------------------
> > > Sponsored by: AMD - Your access to the experts on Hammer Technology! > 
> > Open Source & Linux Developers, register now for the AMD Developer > > 
>Symposium. Code: EX8664 http://www.developwithamd.com/developerlab
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Jboss-development mailing list
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
> > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > Sponsored by: AMD - Your access to the experts on Hammer Technology! > 
>Open Source & Linux Developers, register now for the AMD Developer > 
>Symposium. Code: EX8664 http://www.developwithamd.com/developerlab
> > _______________________________________________
> > Jboss-development mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
>
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>Sponsored by: AMD - Your access to the experts on Hammer Technology! Open 
>Source & Linux Developers, register now for the AMD Developer Symposium. 
>Code: EX8664 http://www.developwithamd.com/developerlab
>_______________________________________________
>Jboss-development mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: AMD - Your access to the experts
on Hammer Technology! Open Source & Linux Developers, register now
for the AMD Developer Symposium. Code: EX8664
http://www.developwithamd.com/developerlab
_______________________________________________
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user

Reply via email to