take a look on SourceForge on how to access CVS anonymously
cvs checkout -r Branch_3_2 jboss-3.2 cd jboss-3.2/build build.sh that's it. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andrew May > Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 8:46 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] CMR Error under load > > > I don't see a RC5 release on sourceforge, so I assume this means > I have to build it from > CVS. I'll give that a go, but as I've never tried it before it > could take me a while > (never actually used CVS I confess) - still it's something I > ought to be able to do. > > If anyone has a chance to run my test on this version of JBoss > I'd be grateful - it'll > probably be at least a day before I get that far. > > Andrew > > Alex Loubyansky wrote: > > > Could you, please, try it on JBoss-3.2.0RC5 which is the current > > version. > > I have a testcase that failed in my old 3.2 and passes in current > > 3.2.0RC5. > > > > Please, try it. > > > > alex > > > > Monday, March 31, 2003, 12:37:32 PM, Andrew May wrote: > > > > AM> OK, here's a test case that recreates the problem for me. > > > > AM> I've attached test.jar which is the ejb-jar and also > includes the test case class. Also > > AM> attached is test-src.jar which has the source code for the > EJBs and the test. I'm afraid > > AM> I've been hacking around existing build scripts to create > the test so I've not included > > AM> any way of building the code. I'm using an older version of XDoclet. > > > > AM> There are 2 entities, Parent and Child. The CMRTest class > creates multiple threads to call > > AM> the getPropertyMap() method on the Parent. This method > iterates around the CMR collection > > AM> of children, and when multiple threads are run causes > occasional CMR errors. > > > > AM> In jbosscmp-jdbc.xml the datasource is java:/jdbc.testPool > and the mapping is for Oracle8. > > AM> My test doesn't create the test data, so I've manually > inserted data before running the > > AM> test. I've found that it's only necessary to have one child > record to recreate the problem. > > > > AM> The CMRTest class takes 3 arguments - the parent primary > key, number of threads, number of > > AM> loops per thread. e.g.: > > > > AM> java com.ingenta.acs.test.ejb.CMRTest test1 30 100 > > > > AM> 30 threads with 100 loops always causes at least one CMR > error for me. I've tested on two > > AM> setups, both of which cause errors. > > > > AM> 1) Solaris, Sun JDK1.3.1, JBoss 3.2.0RC3, Oracle 8.1.7.2.0 > > AM> 2) Linux (Mandrake 9), Sun JDK1.4.1, JBoss 3.2.0RC4, Oracle > 8.1.7.2.0 > > > > AM> jboss.xml in the ejb-jar declares all get* methods to be > read-only. If I remove this the > > AM> CMR error does not occur, but the test goes a lot slower. > > > > AM> Let me know if there's any more information you need. > > > > AM> Andrew > > > > AM> Dain Sundstrom wrote: > > > > > >>>I fixed a similar bug in this stuff for Sacha on March 19th (version > >>>1.43.2.13). The problem was registering for transaction > synchronization > >>>on the transaction in the context and not the transaction associated > >>>with the current thread. This bug created the type of problem > you have > >>>described, but the fix should bin in 3.2 rc4. > >>> > >>>Until someone can create a test case that reproduces the new bug, I > >>>don't think there is much we can do. > >>> > >>>-dain > >>> > >>>On Friday, March 28, 2003, at 10:01 AM, Alex Loubyansky wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>>Hello Andrew, > >>>> > >>>>you are not alone complaining about this. But nobody could produce a > >>>>testcase that fail at least eventually. > >>>> > >>>>I am trying to reproduce it but can't for the moment. > >>>> > >>>>I have a Parent and 1000 of related Child entities. > >>>>I have 100 concurrent threads finding parent by primary key, getting > >>>>children and iterating through relation collection. > >>>>I use standard container for both Parent and Child. > >>>>In jboss.xml get methods are read-only for both Parent and Child. > >>>> > >>>>Any more info you can provide? Again a testcase would be great. Let it > >>>>fail not each time but eventually. > >>>> > >>>>Thank you, > >>>>alex > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: > > Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! > > No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server > > http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ > > _______________________________________________ > > JBoss-user mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: > Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! > No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server > http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > JBoss-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
