<quote>
Update: 07/18 02:44 GMT by CN: The FSF's Executive Director, Brad Kuhn adds "LGPL's S. 6 allows you to make new works that link with the LGPL'ed code, and license them any way you see fit. Only the LGPL'ed code itself must remain Free. Such 'client code' can even be proprietary; it need not be LGPL'ed."
</quote>
-- xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Barlow, Dustin wrote:
Saw this article on slashdot yesterday ...
http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/07/17/2257224&mode=thread&t id=108&tid=117&tid=126&tid=156&tid=99
... and although it looks like the guys from FSF have somewhat clarified their earlier statements, it still leaves some doubt as to how commercial companies (such as the one I work for) are effected by the use of LGPL software as a basis for implementing closed source products.
Dustin Barlow
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine. WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines at the same time. Free trial click here: http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/345/0 _______________________________________________ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
