If was a frequently asked question in the forums for 3.0 that MQSeries didn't support an XAConnectionFactory. You had to fallback to acknowledgements with no XA <xa-connection>false</xa-connection> in the MDB config
3.2 detects whether a connectionfactory implements XAConnectionFactory Somebody else pointed out a bug in JBoss's ServerSessionPool that caused a deadlock in MQSeries. It wasn't a problem for jbossmq (is that what you are referring to?) Regards, Adrian On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 20:45, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I managed to have MQSeries configured as a JMS provider in JBoss (and > then have JBoss MDB listening to MQ queues). But XA support did not > work (got an answer from on of the JBoss developer mentioning some > incompatibility between what MQSeries XA requires and what JBoss TM is > doing. Seems that JMS spec has some holes in this area). > > I also managed to have SonicMQ working, but I did not test yet the XA > capability. > In any cases, if you are able to add WebLogic as a JMS provider in > JBoss, you can basically do anything you want: > - JBoss MDB listening to WebLogic queue/topics > - Any JBoss component (MDB, EJB, Mbeans, ...) sending messages > to WebLogic queue/topics > - As long as you are within one JBoss server, and if WebLogic > JMS XA works with JBoss TM, then you can do XA (transaction integrity) > between all those pieces (weblogic queue/topics and other JBoss > queue/topics or XA database sources). > > Thomas Cherel > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Adrian Brock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 2:55 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] JMS: JBoss to Weblogic messaging > > No, a distributed TM is only required when there are multiple > transaction managers. > > The JBossTM enlists the JMS's XASession/XAResource. > There is only one transaction manager. > > If the MDB did a remote ejb invocation then it would require a DTM. > > Of course you might want a logging TM for recovery. > > It should work with any JMS implementation. I've only tried it > with JBoss<->JBoss. I've heard of people doing it with Arjuna > and MQSeries. > Sonic seem to want you replace JBoss's ServerSessionPoolFactory > for reasons I don't understand. > > Regards, > Adrian > > On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 18:58, Barlow, Dustin wrote: > > In the 3.x series, how are CMTs handled if the JBoss MDB binds to a > queue on > > a Weblogic instance? Doesn't this require distributed TM which > isn't > > currently supported in 3.x? Would this even work between two JBoss > 3.x > > instances? > > > > Dustin > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Adrian Brock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 1:24 PM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] JMS: JBoss to Weblogic messaging > > > > > > > > > There are two types of interoperability. > > > > > > JBoss MDB can use any messaging system (it doesn't care about > jbossmq) > > > > > > Different JMS systems can transport each others messages > > > (typically by wrapping them in their own native message) - > > > this is obviously slower than a uniform environment. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Adrian > > > > > > On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 17:26, Dan Christopherson wrote: > > > > Curley, John wrote: > > > > > Hi, All: > > > > > > > > > > Can anyone give me feedback on performing JMS messaging > to/from > > > > > JBoss/WebLogic environments? > > > > > > > > > > Should there be any issues with guaranteed messaging? > > > > > > > > > > In theory, there should be interoperability between the > > > two environments as > > > > > implied by the J2EE specification. > > > > > > > > Not really. The J2EE spec guarantees that applications will > > > be portable > > > > between environments, not that servers will be interoperable. > > > > > > > > Depending on exactly what you need to do, you can use the JBoss > JMS > > > > implementation from within weblogic, or the weblogic > > > implementation from > > > > within JBoss, by constructing your initial JNDI context > > > appropriately. > > > > > > > > hth, > > > > danch > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > > > Welcome to geek heaven. > > > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > JBoss-user mailing list > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > > Welcome to geek heaven. > > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > > _______________________________________________ > > > JBoss-user mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > Welcome to geek heaven. > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > _______________________________________________ > > JBoss-user mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > JBoss-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
