On Tuesday 18 November 2003 14:30, Alexey Loubyansky wrote: Hi,
> >>Under option A, it does the getItems() against the db. > >>But the actual iteration/load is done against the cache. > > > > Just to make sure I understand, with Commit A the finder is querying the > > DB, which contains a 'record' that has been deleted from the cache, but > > not from the DB, > > No. When remove is called on an instance, the synchronization occurs. > The case you described should not be possible. <g> I also find those. > Are the clients accessing different orders which have common items? And > then one of the common items is removed? Yes, they could also be accessing the same 'order' and (with the same the same items) Phil -- 2:07pm up 3 days, 23:33, 1 user, load average: 0.19, 0.18, 0.12 ICQ: 760757 | AIM: pjshrimpton | Y!: pjshrimpton | [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- This SF. Net email is sponsored by: GoToMyPC GoToMyPC is the fast, easy and secure way to access your computer from any Web browser or wireless device. Click here to Try it Free! https://www.gotomypc.com/tr/OSDN/AW/Q4_2003/t/g22lp?Target=mm/g22lp.tmpl _______________________________________________ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
