Man you are bitchin today :)
Yeah it's one of those days that started all wrong! But I still like JBoss. In the end it always gets the job done :-)
I'm pretty sure you're only required to do pass-by-value for calls through the remote interface. This would be a significant performance hit if set and get inside of the bean always did a copy. Besides, Collections returned from getRelationship are not copies.
Ok.
FYI, I know you don't care now, but we will look into the Tomcat virtual-host thing you bitched about a few emails ago too.
Actually I do care. Tomcat 5.0 looks promising and I will probably use that in the future when it and the JBoss integration is more stable. So thanks for looking into this issue. I can file a complete bug report if you want, with log entries, etc.
S.
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
