Greetings,

I deployed a set of entity beans in my jboss as clustered beans. I have also a 
stateless session bean which handles those entity beans (local interfaces). I was 
wondering what information is really clustered for entity beans in cluster (in real, 
my entity beans are flagged as cluster but they extends the Standard CMP 2.x 
EntityBean with cache invalidation rather than Clustered CMP 2.x EntityBeanbecause I 
need cache invalidation...), since entity information cannot be replicated since I 
have only local interfaces (and I don't know if it makes sense since data is database).

I could be doing a big confusion here but if information is not passed by value from 
one instance to the other one (local interfaces), is jboss passing any kind of 
information to the another jboss instances to prepare/load those referenced entity 
beans instances, in case of future requests and load-balancing issues?

If I am not mistaken, I read something about only homes are prepared on cluster. Is 
this correct?
What is the real advantage of doing it against the non-clustered beans? I mean, in a 
jboss instance I only can access the entity beans in that instance since I'm using 
only local interfaces. So, the current jboss instance never requests any information 
from another instances (weight load-balancing issues), unless for locality/time cache 
references.

regards,
Pedro Salazar.

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3845842#3845842

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3845842


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33
Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift.
http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285
_______________________________________________
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user

Reply via email to