After going through this posts, we have implemented the passing of context ( in our case an id ) during a transaction using the interceptors at ejb proxy and container level as suggested by Scott.
As such the Invocation object, which has holds the payload to be used during the chain of invocation, didn't retain our value set during the whole transaction, so we had to use ThreadLocal objects, to propogate the id. Moreover couldnt find a better way of injecting the "id", than tampering with the Principal object. ( The "id" injected as the name of the caller principal is used by the entities to query an in memory datastructure to get the current transaction context). The above implementation works, need to do so rigorous testing, but it works. Is it safe to use ThreadLocal objects in Interceptors? Is there a better way to inject an "id", rather than tampering Principal? Please suggest. Thanks Vikram. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3882695#3882695 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3882695 ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click _______________________________________________ JBoss-user mailing list JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
