Hello,
ok I know this has been discussed, but here is what is not clear, and may be 
possibly there is doc somewhere that explains it all, but I have not found one:

working with JBoss 3.2.6 cluster
Server_1:  is a master node for JMS
Server_2:  is a participant using server_1 for all JMS processing for MDBs and 
EJBs

Running code on Server_2:

1. if I want to get a non transactional ConnectionFactory it seems like I   
    have to go through HAJNDI and with this code 
    ?topicConnectionFactory= (TopicConnectionFactory)
               nonLocalInitialContext.lookup("java:/ConnectionFactory");?
    
     by nonLocalInitialContext I mean it has to go through HAJNDI because 
     it retrieves the ?ConnectionFactory? running and define in
      ?deploy-hasingleton/jms/uil2-service.xml? on Server_1

2. now, if I want to get access to the transaction JMS, I can reference
    ?JmsXA? on Server_2 in "deploy/ hajndi-jms-ds.xml? file which will 
     use ?JMSProviderLoader? to get right ?ConnectionFactory? on the  
     master server, and to get access to ?JmsXA? I can go through a  
     local ?InitialContext?.


Questions:

A. I understand that it makes sense to use ?XA? reference here for 
    transaction because it is distributed, and it?s nice to go through a 
    local ?InitialContext? (although I assume I still can not cache reference 
    to the ?ConnectionFactory? I get back fail over is not supported), but 
    should not there be a way to do the same thing for a non 
    transaction ?ConnectionFactory? instead of using two 
    different ?InitialContext? and in order to look up the Queue, I still have 
    to use
    non local InitialContext ?(Queue)nonLocalInitialContext.lookup(name);?

B. if I?m running everything on one server (not in clustered env), I found 
    that it?s still  recommended to use ?JmsXA?, but I don?t understand why 
    because you are not running in a distributed environment, so why would 
    you need an overhead of distributed transaction vs a local one?

C. If I?m running in a non clustered env. should not I be using 
     configuration in ?jvm-il-service.xml? for both transaction and 
     non-transactional stuff. or I should still use ?ConnectioFactory? defined 
     in ?uil-service.xml? and from what I have seen in other topics I can not 
     use ?XAConnectionFactory? defined in
     ?uil-service.xml? (back to question 2, sorry), I have to use ?JmsXA?

                   Thank you


View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3907252#3907252

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3907252


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc.  Get Certified Today
Register for a JBoss Training Course.  Free Certification Exam
for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005. For more info visit:
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7628&alloc_id=16845&op=click
_______________________________________________
JBoss-user mailing list
JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user

Reply via email to