I agree Portal 2.0.1 works fine and is much simpler to configure and documentation is almost there.
Portal 2.2 is missing documentation, has features that are either complicated or does not trace information on what is going wrong or missing. In addition, there are major bugs. It's a real pain. But there is a huge gap in features between the two (much better CMS, deployment package, and bunch of others). Concepts are better, documentation is missing, and quality is certainly not production level, perhaps beta1. I 'd like it better to have a real 2.2 production level release than a 2.4. We'll see what is coming next. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3917989#3917989 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3917989 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ JBoss-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
