There is an open JIRA issue on this one: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCS-5
- Peter -----Original Message----- From: Mike Perham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 5:47 PM To: JCS Developers List Subject: Re: source and binaries It doesn't matter what is best. I'm constrained by our internal rules: if I can't get the source cooresponding to a release so it can be verified, I can't use it. There's no 1.2.7.7 tag. mike Aaron Smuts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 08/10/2006 04:22:58 PM: > The 1.2.7.7 is the best. I will cut a 1.2.7.8 tag > soon, since I've been using it in prod for some time > now. > > We will have an official release in the next few > weeks, no doubt. > > Aaron > > --- Mike Perham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > We are considering using OJB and in doing so, we > > would need to pull JCS > > into our system. > > > > It's a little concerning that JCS does not have an > > official release and has > > few tags which coorespond to known stable > > checkpoints in the codebase. > > There are a few tags here > > (http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/jcs/tags/) > > but there are versions > > missing, including the most recent patch binaries. > > > > So why has JCS never had an official release? > > Basically I need to need to > > get stable source and it seems like 1.2.7.3 is the > > best I can get right > > now. > > > > mike > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
