Hi :) No worries.. take your time.
Thanks Nuno On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 15:25, Aaron Smuts <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry for the delay. I'm working on it, but lots of other things keep > coming up. It will take a couple more weeks. > > Aaron > > --- On Thu, 10/1/09, Nuno Sénica <[email protected]> wrote: > > > From: Nuno Sénica <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: Remove dependency for concurrent.jar > > To: "JCS Users List" <[email protected]> > > Date: Thursday, October 1, 2009, 12:13 PM > > Hi Aaron, > > > > Sorry to bother you again with this issue.. > > > > Are there any news regarding this ? > > > > Best regards, > > Nuno > > > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 16:23, Nuno Sénica <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi Aaron :) > > > > > > Here I am again querying you on the status of this > > task. > > > > > > Did you have the chance the start it ? :) How it is > > going. > > > > > > Best regards, > > > Nuno Sénica > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 11:31, Nuno Sénica <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > >> Hi Aaron > > >> > > >> Once again thanks for your inputs.. > > >> > > >> Since it is not a matter of find and replace, > > maybe I'll wait a couple of > > >> weeks so that you take on that task :) > > >> > > >> I'll poke by then just to know how the work is > > going. > > >> > > >> Regads and thanks a lot once again. > > >> > > >> Nuno > > >> > > >> > > >> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 16:24, Aaron Smuts <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > >> > > >>> It's not a simple matter of find and > > replace. If it was, I would have > > >>> done it some time back. . . . > > >>> > > >>> This is such an extensive change, it's > > probably best that I do it. But > > >>> feel free to give it a try. > > >>> > > >>> Thanks, > > >>> > > >>> Aaron > > >>> > > >>> --- On Thu, 8/27/09, Aaron Smuts <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > >>> > > >>> > From: Aaron Smuts <[email protected]> > > >>> > Subject: Re: Remove dependency for > > concurrent.jar > > >>> > To: "JCS Users List" <[email protected]> > > >>> > Date: Thursday, August 27, 2009, 8:21 AM > > >>> > In my first email, I pointed out > > >>> > several things that would need to be > > changed. You can > > >>> > simply search for the util concurrent > > import and find them > > >>> > all. > > "EDU.oswego.cs.dl.util.concurrent" > > >>> > > > >>> > ClockDaemon is used more than the poooled > > executor. . . . > > >>> > > > >>> > Yes, there is a backport for JDK > > 1.4. A backport > > >>> > implements something available only in a > > new version. > > >>> > In this case, the backport is of the 1.5 > > concurrent > > >>> > library. This allows you to compile > > and run in > > >>> > 1.4. But if you are running 1.5 or > > later, you don't > > >>> > need to backport jar. > > >>> > > > >>> > There are some subtle changes between the > > two. But it > > >>> > should be perfectly possible to get it > > working in a few > > >>> > days. Take a crack at it if you > > want. I'll get > > >>> > to it in about two weeks. > > >>> > > > >>> > Aaron > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > --- On Thu, 8/27/09, Jeffrey Kesselman > > <[email protected]> > > >>> > wrote: > > >>> > > > >>> > > From: Jeffrey Kesselman <[email protected]> > > >>> > > Subject: Re: Remove dependency for > > concurrent.jar > > >>> > > To: "JCS Users List" <[email protected]> > > >>> > > Date: Thursday, August 27, 2009, > > 8:02 AM > > >>> > > Well i don't know the codebase so > > >>> > > Aaron is your better reference > > there > > >>> > > BUT... > > >>> > > > > >>> > > Since the large majority of Doug's > > concurrent library > > >>> > got > > >>> > > ported as is into > > >>> > > the JDK, Id start by simply taking > > his library out of > > >>> > your > > >>> > > build path in > > >>> > > eclipse. Then follow the > > errors and everywhere it > > >>> > > can't find a reference to > > >>> > > a concurrent utility, use's > > Eclipse's help to add the > > >>> > > proper import. > > >>> > > > > >>> > > Id imagine it cant be more then a > > day or two of very > > >>> > > mechanical work... > > >>> > > > > >>> > > Alternately, if your a perl type > > hacker you could try > > >>> > > writing a script that > > >>> > > would look for the string that is > > doug's package name > > >>> > in > > >>> > > the file and > > >>> > > repalce it with the JDK package. > > >>> > > > > >>> > > JK > > >>> > > > > >>> > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 10:36 AM, > > Nuno Sénica <[email protected]> > > >>> > > wrote: > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > Hi Jeffrey and Aaron, > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > We are currently evaluating the > > effort to > > >>> > perform > > >>> > > those changes.. If the > > >>> > > > effort is not that big, I > > personally, would like > > >>> > to > > >>> > > make that change and > > >>> > > > contribute to the community. > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > I'll need some guideline from > > where to start, > > >>> > and > > >>> > > regarding that I'm > > >>> > > > relying > > >>> > > > on you guys :D > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > Which should be the best > > approach to start this > > >>> > change > > >>> > > ? > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > Regards, > > >>> > > > Nuno > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 15:30, > > Jeffrey Kesselman > > >>> > > <[email protected]> > > >>> > > wrote: > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > The source is available, > > couldn't you go > > >>> > through > > >>> > > it and change the > > >>> > > > > references yourselves? > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > That seems a lot less > > costly then abandoning > > >>> > the > > >>> > > whole library. > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > Maybe you could even > > contribute those > > >>> > changes > > >>> > > back to the community... > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at > > 7:02 AM, Nuno > > >>> > Sénica > > >>> > > <[email protected]> > > >>> > > wrote: > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > Hi all, > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > At the company where > > I work for, we > > >>> > have an > > >>> > > application which relies on > > >>> > > > > JCS > > >>> > > > > > and it has proven to > > be a good solution > > >>> > so > > >>> > > far. But now, we were > > >>> > > > informed > > >>> > > > > > about legal issues by > > using concurrent > > >>> > lib > > >>> > > and we are being instructed > > >>> > > > to > > >>> > > > > > change the caching > > lib. > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > My question is if > > there's any plan to > > >>> > use > > >>> > > the native concurrent instead > > >>> > > > > of > > >>> > > > > > the lib that JSC > > depend on at the > > >>> > moment ? > > >>> > > Is so, when it is planned to > > >>> > > > > be > > >>> > > > > > available ? > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > Thanks in advance. > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > Regards, > > >>> > > > > > Nuno > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > -- > > >>> > > > > ~~ Microsoft help desk > > says: reply hazy, > > >>> > ask > > >>> > > again later. ~~ > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > -- > > >>> > > ~~ Microsoft help desk says: reply > > hazy, ask again > > >>> > later. > > >>> > > ~~ > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > >>> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
