At 08:29 AM 6/24/99 -0400, Brad Giaccio wrote:
>>
>> This releases adds context-sensitive help for class names. To
>> use this facility, first customize the variable jde-help-javadoc-dirs
>> to specify a list of the directories containing javadoc class
>> documentation on your system. Once you have done this, typing
>> C-c C-v C-h causes the JDE to display the javadoc for the class
>> at point in the current buffer. The command uses the browser that you
>> have specifed with Emacs browse-url package to display the
>> class documentation. The default browse-url browser is Netscape.
>> See the browse-url documentation for information on specifying
>> another browser, such as w3. Thanks to Phillip Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> for reviewing and enhancing the code for this command.
>>
>
>Alright I'm not sure what is going on here. I tried something simple
>started up xemacs went to a java buffer moved my point over "System"
>typed C-c C-v C-h, I see starting bsh, then as usual I get the End of
>Stream error. When bsh starts I see
>
>BeanShell 0.96 beta - by Pat Niemeyer ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
>(list "java.lang.System")
>bsh %
>
>meaning the call eventually got processed and it found it. Now with
>both buffers visible I try again. and I get Cannot find documentation
>for System but nothing ever happens in bsh. It is like it never tries
>to call it again.So I try a different word, and it comes back equally
>as quicklly. Any thoughts on what to do here I'm running xemacs21.0 on
>solaris.
>
Interactions between internal JDE code and the BeanShell do not appear
in the bsh window.
>I don't know that you need my .emacs, but I'm not using project files
It generally saves everybody time to supply complete information rather
than making assumptions about what information is necessary.
In this case, it would be nice to know
1) .emacs file
2) Version of the JDK you are using.
3) Path to the JDK javadoc directory on your system.
- Paul
>just my .emacs and yes I did set the javadoc-dirs through customize.
>
>
>
>--
>--- There are two kinds of knowledge, you either know the answer or
> you know where to find it
> -Kane, Johnson, and anonymous
