>>>>> "Rodrigo" == Rodrigo Reyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rodrigo> When such a name is found, it calls the
Rodrigo> jde.util.Completion class to get back all the possible
Rodrigo> completion for this variable. Then, it builds a completion
Rodrigo> list that can complete the "meth" method, or let every
Rodrigo> possible choise, if the method is empty ("").
Rodrigo> Of course, such a design _require_ to have the class
Rodrigo> already compiled and added in the bsh classpath. I have
Rodrigo> reasons to think that relying on the parser will give slow
Rodrigo> and non-robust results. Another method is to used the TAGS
Rodrigo> file, but, hey, there's nothing inside that's not easily
Rodrigo> available through java introspection.
Rodrigo> There are still many situation that are not handled by the
Rodrigo> jde-complete.el, but I believe the most common cases are
Rodrigo> handled OK.
It seems to fail to identify the Type in the
public void actionPerformed( ActionEvent event )
{
Object src = event.getSource();
}
situation, or at least it does in my case. A quick
flick through the "parser" with edebug tends to suggest to me at least
that this occurs because it identifies the type incorrectly. I havent
tried this out throughly, so perhaps it was just my test case. If it
works for you Ill come up with a good test case.
I was wondering whether it would make sense to use
the parser to parse the current file (which if I am not mistaken
DOESNT need to be pre-compiled, only the type to be completed on!) to
get the type information out? I have absolutely no experience with
parsing, which is why I ask. Also there are a couple of things that I
would quite like to develop, but which need variable to type matching
(for instance the jump to help files command should really offer the
type of the variable under point whilst at the moment it offers the
variable name which is no use!). There are lots of other things for
which syntactic information would be useful. Its a pity CC-mode stores
syntatic information in the way it does, rather than the rather more
accessible info provided by something like psgml mode. (I suspect C
and Java is more complex to parse!).
Phil
