Actually, what I'd really like is a choice of debugging environments for the
JDE. While the progress with jdebug looks promising, and I certainly don't
want to undercut or make less of everyone's tremendous effort in that
regard, being able to use a fully graphically debugger might be nice. This
could be accomplished a couple ways. Ideally, I'd like just be able to use
JDE along such a debugger. (It's too bad the old jikes debugger died, as it
looked promising for this kind of setup). Alternatively, I'd like to replace
JBuilder's built in editor with emacs. But in the later case, there's really
little reason to preserve JDE functionality as it is duplicated by the IDE.
----- Original Message -----
From: spencer marks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thomas Nichols
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 13, 1999 9:02 AM
Subject: Re: Forte for Java / JBuilder integration?
> I would be very interested in this. I'd be happy to help as well.(Right
now
> I prefer JBuilder to Netbeans/Forte, but hopefully we could use a generic
> mechanism though.)
>
> Spencer
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Thomas Nichols <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, December 13, 1999 7:30 AM
> Subject: Forte for Java / JBuilder integration?
>
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Many of you will have seen that both Forte (Sun/NetBeans) and Borland
> > (Inprise) have released "community" freely available editions. (Note
that
> > these are not Open Source, though). See
> > http://www.netbeans.com/ffj/community/
> > and http://www.borland.com/
> > Is there any interest in integrating JDE and Emacs/XEmacs with either of
> > these? This would give the editing power of Emacs / XEmacs with the
> > "graphical" / "code editing" mode switching of these RAD tools. What do
> > people think?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Thomas.
> >
> > ----
> > Thomas Nichols, Worcester, UK
> >
> >
>
>
