At 08:37 AM 8/8/00 -0500, you wrote: > >If I use JDebug->Trace-Exceptions to set a trace on a exception, and >tell it to suspend the process when that exception is thrown, jdebug >stops at the throwpoint correctly, but doesn't take me to the source >for the throwpoint. However, I have no control over the stack at that >point - if I display the threads, the main thread is at the position >in the stack that the exception was thrown from, however jdebug >doesn't "know" that the process is suspended, so I can't continue, or >move up/down the stack. If I explicitly tell jdebug to suspend using >Jdebug->processes->suspend process, I am then able to continue as well >as examine variables local to that stack frame where the exception was >thrown, but still cannot move up/down the stack, or display the local >variables buffer. I guess you need to make JDE handle exception >tracing more like a breakpoint, taking you to the source for the >throwpoint, and allowing you (some of?)the same actions allowed at a >breakpoint. Let me know if you need more details, > Hi Matt, I agree. Exception handling needs to be improved. I'll put this on my list of things to do. Regards, Paul ------------------------------------------------------------ TECH SUPPORT POLICY I respond only to requests that contain a complete problem report. The easiest way to ensure that your report is complete is to include the output of the JDE->Help->Submit Problem Report command in your request. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] JDE website: http://sunsite.auc.dk/jde/ JDE mailing list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html
