[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > >> Kevin A. Burton wrote: >> >> >>>> David Hay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>>> >> ... >> >>>> - second round of JPDA pampering; believed to make it happy now >>>> >> ... >> >> >>> What would make you believe this. Does it state *anywhere* that >>> Jikes is capable of being 100% compatible with JPDA bytecode? >>> >> The line containing, "second round of JPDA pampering" is a direct >> quote from the Jikes 1.15 release notes. I suggest rather than >> jumping down someones throat who was only trying to be helpful >> you go and take a look for yourself. >> > > I think you misunderstood. I really wasn't jumping down your throat > but instead I was *excited* that jikes might be more compatible > with JPDA. :)
No worries and no offence taken. As I said, I haven't had a chance to try out the new version. So we'll have to see what this "second round of JPDA pampering" means wrt JDE. David
