Not really. Maybe you can check the size of a fresh emacs process occasionally to see if you can guess what might be triggering any unwarranted memory usage. Did the memory size go up after you upgraded emacs or jde or semantic or any particular package?
Are you using windows? My emacs process size goes up dramatically if I access the machine it is running on using Windows Remote Desktop and maximize the emacs window. Suraj On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 14:07:24 -0800, Raul Acevedo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That's cool... but it's still only about one megabyte. I still have > close to 100 megabytes of unexplained memory somewhere... any thoughts? > > Raul > > > > On Thu, 2004-11-18 at 13:15 -0800, Suraj Acharya wrote: > > The jde-beanshell-buffer is something that jde-usages to record the > > output of bsh. It's like a *Messages* buffer for the beanshell, but > > unlike *Messages* it doesn't clear out old entries. > > Adding the equivalent of message-log-size for this buffer is on my to-do > > list. > > > > You can delete the buffer at any point without any adverse effects. > > The next time jde-usages makes a call to bsh it will create the buffer > > if it does not exist. > > > > Suraj > > > > On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 11:53:11 -0800, Raul Acevedo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Right now my Emacs process is using 127 Megs of memory. While the > > > *jde-beanshell-scratch* buffer size is 1239491, and another buffer I > > > have is also just over 1 Meg, the total sum of all my buffers is still > > > only a few megabytes, I definitely am not consuming anywhere near 100 > > > megabytes in buffers. > > > > > > What could be taking up all the memory? How do I free it up? I've had > > > emacs run out of memory a few times in the last couple of weeks. > > > > > > Raul > > > > > > > >
