At Wed, 29 Jul 2009 18:13:59 +0200,
Tobias Gerdin wrote:
> When using JDEE for J2ME development, it is not very convenient that the
> classpath always includes the Java SE JRE rt.jar (even if it's not present in
> jde-global-classpath), since it renders the class name qualification algorithm
> more ambiguous.
> 
> For instance, if I try to complete the class 'Image', I need to specify if I 
> denote
> java.awt.Image or javax.microedition.lcdui.Image, even though the former class
> isn't present in J2ME. This also confuses the automatic adder of import 
> statements.
> 
> Would would be the best solution to solve this?

The way I currently avoid importing from jarfiles I'm not interested
in, is to have per-project customizations of
jde-import-excluded-classes. You could blanket exclude all java.awt if
you wanted.  Is that sufficient for your needs?

Cheers,
Len.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with 
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
jdee-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jdee-users

Reply via email to