Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hello, > > Yee Keat Phuah <[email protected]> writes: > > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 10:11 PM, Ludovic Courtès <[email protected]> wrote: > > [snip] > >> My feeling is that there's a gap to be bridged between both tools. It > >> would be nice if Semantic were able to handle (2), so that we'd have a > >> uniform handling of Java symbol/class lookup. > > > > > > I am actually playing around with this. > > Great! > > > Its actually quite easy to extract out symbols from .class files, the > > format > > is pretty well documented and the parser can be easily ported from eclipse. > > JDEE has a `.class' parser written in elisp (jde-parse-class.el). My > understanding is that it's currently underutilized, as the commentary in > this file suggests.
I'm weary of anything that isn't supported well that parses classes. The class format changes between releases of the JDK and I we (JDEE) don't have the resources to keep up with the changing format. > In an ideal world, Semantic/Senator's neat completion framework would > allow us to complete things regardless of whether they are defined in a > `.java' or `.class' file---as opposed to choosing between `C-c C-v .' > and `M-/' depending on the phase of the moon. My feeling is that semantic is the way to go for all things for which we have source and using a (common) lisp JVM language (i.e. abcl/armed bear) for everything else. -- Paul Landes [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ jdee-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jdee-users
