I move for storage:avatar. I feel fine tabelling OOB until we work out
it's details some more. Standards JIG is getting rolling and we'll
tackle that one soon enough. Any other tweaks before we write this up
and submit it for approval?
--temas
On Tue, 2001-09-04 at 13:57, Thomas Charron wrote:
> Quoting Jens Alfke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Tuesday, September 4, 2001, at 10:46 AM, Thomas Charron wrote:
> > > I think it was accidental.. 8-P Either that, or done intentionally
> > > so the
> > > server would store it without requiring a module.. 8-P
> > The public-XML-storage feature was explicitly [mis]designed so that only
> > namespaces that don't begin with "jabber:" will get stored. Which puts
> > one in a quandary about how to define a standard public-storage
> > namespace. I suggested "jaber:" with one "b" as the standard prefix for
> > these, but this might cause confusion. "jabber-public-storage:"
> > perhaps?
>
> Ya, thats a fun one. I figured that MIGHT be the reason for doing that, but
> I'm not sure using a namespace with 1 b instead of 2 is a good solution. Hack
> solution, for sure, but whos gonna remember that peculiarity years down the
> road.. I'd almost want to say use something like the above, or
> simply "storage:avatar" or "data:avatar".
>
> ---
> Thomas Charron
> << Wanted: One decent sig >>
> << Preferably litle used >>
> _______________________________________________
> jdev mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
_______________________________________________
jdev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
