I'm not sure, but I thought priority ties were decided by whichever changed presence last.
-David Waite Derek J. Balling wrote: > OK, let me see if I understand something properly: > > 1.) If user@server/Home sends a message to "someone else", that > someone else should reply to, obviously, user@server/Home, since > that's where it knows user IS, correct? > > 2.) The Jabber book, on p.127, says: > > "In the event there's a priority tie, the most recent connection to > the Jabber server wins" > > By connection, do we mean "Session start" or "activity seen"? The > reason I ask is that we have a lot of employees with dedicated access > at home, and it would make sense that folks would just leave their > Jabber client running at home and running at work. Now, to make sure > they always get their messages, they can either: > > (a) constantly twiddle the priorities to be "higher than the other place" > (b) leave them at the same priority, but every time they > (go-home|get-to-work) sign out and sign back in > > but a nicer alternative would be: > > (c) have the server know "ah, Home and Work have the same priority, > but I last saw ACTIVITY from Work, so they must be there." (or vice > versa) > > Is "C" do-able? > > D > _______________________________________________ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
