So what is the correct behavior or a transport in regards to resources? -David Waite
Julian Fitzell wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> maybe this is already known... >> >> when i added connected with a second resource(/resource2) to my >> jabber account (server amessage.de) both connected had no priority >> set (0). >> Whatever other clients keep on sending msgs to the last connected >> resource(/resource2) the icq/aim gateway sends itīs msgs to the older >> resource(/resource1) the gateways to not even become available to the >> /resource2 >> >> is this a transport bug or must it be my fault? > > > Definitely a transport bug as far as I'm concerned. The transports > make poor use of resources and presence in my opinion. I started > trying to hack it to work better at one point but didn't get very > far. I think it's just low on people's priority lists. > > But definitely not your fault. > > Julian > _______________________________________________ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
