Hi, thanks for the clarifications.
Jeremie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > There shouldn't be a problem leaving them under the JOSL, but to be > honest, the code in those files isn't the best and I've always felt > they're in need of a rewrite anyway. The jid one needs to be > brought up to spec to JEP 29, and the jpacket/jutil ones are > dependent on the old xmlnode dom and will have to be rewritten > reguardless. I will use the appropriate mod_jabber files instead and try to follow the jep etc. as needed. > I don't think they are probably ready yet, and I'm not sure if any > of that has changed since then inside the apr. If your interested > in helping flesh them out, just catch me online someday > (jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) and I'll probably set up cvs and we can go from > there. Ok. There is just a problem or two ;-). Because of firewall restrictions I can use neither jabber nor the cvs pserver protocol. As things will be small I will send patches/source if someone wants them. cheers, andreas _______________________________________________ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
