Hi all, Correct me if i'm wrong, but surely efficiency is also one of the goals of the jabber server? I know that there were plans to lose pth at some point, and surely this kind of approach would benefit all. What I would love is to see a server with the best of both worlds, rather than a fork in the technology.
Regards, David On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 12:10:39PM +0100, lukasm wrote: > Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > > >This seems to be jabberd 1.4.2 (?) with pthreads instead of pth for the > >threading. Is there any reason you did not just contribute these changes > >to the jabberd project rather than make your own project? I'm confused. > > > > > WPJabber is based on jabberd1.4.2 but wpjabber project targets are > different. > Our target is efficiency. WPJabber hasn't all jabberd1.4.2 functionality > due to > different architecture. WPJabber mio and mtq are completly different. > xdb_file is > completly rewritten. jsm is also changed. > Now I'm rewriting deliver functions. > WPJabber was made to handle large amount of users online. > > Lukas > > >Peter > > > >-- > >Peter Saint-Andre > >Jabber Software Foundation > >http://www.jabber.org/people/stpeter.php > > > >On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, lukasm wrote: > > > > > > > >>I'm pleased to aanounce that WPJabber server was putted to CVS on > >>jabberstudio.org. > >>Visit http://wpjabber.jabberstudio.org page for more information. > >> > >>_______________________________________________ > >>jdev mailing list > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev > >> > >> > >> > > > >_______________________________________________ > >jdev mailing list > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > jdev mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev -- David Sutton Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
msg08526/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
