Thanks for the clarification, Justin. With all the standardization forming around Jabber as an open IM protocol, I think the Trillian folks (and many others) will be coming around to Jabber in 2003. :)
Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre Jabber Software Foundation http://www.jabber.org/people/stpeter.php On Sat, 22 Feb 2003, Justin Karneges wrote: > Hi, > > First, the Trillian developers _are_ interested in Jabber, they just haven't > made a public note about it. > > Second, that thread is really old, so the early messages should be > disregarded. I think Jabber's "marketing" has improved over the last year, > going away from multi-IM towards open-IM as more and more users have gained a > clue. You have to understand that most users of the Trillian forum saw > Jabber as redundant, since they were only thinking about transports. Read > the end of the thread, and you'll see that a lot more people have opened up > to Jabber now that they understand what it is. That thread has to hold some > kind of record, too, as it spans over a year. > > I'm supposed to be absent right now, but I felt I had to reply since I'm > probably the only one who can save face for these guys. > > Have fun, > -Justin > > On Saturday 22 February 2003 10:13 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > This is a fine read over at Trillian. Wtf is their deal? > > > > http://www.trillian.cc/forums/showthread.php?s=88747c9447b7f11da69447da6e9e > >487c&threadid=6777&perpage=30&highlight=support%20jabber% > > 20future&pagenumber=1 > > > > Lots of pushback against jabber and obviously > > the trillian dev's are forcefully ignoring jabber > > interop. > > _______________________________________________ > jdev mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev > _______________________________________________ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
