Hi, JD could you please check if I am doing something completly stupid?
I dont want any room locking after creation by a <presence/> with or without enclosed xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/muc#owner' As a hotfix I commented out these lines. My hope is that it does not lock any new room. file: xdata.c function: void xdata_room_config(cnr room, cnu user, int new, xmlnode query) lines: 332,333 replaced: if(new == 1) room->locked = 1; by: /* if(new == 1) room->locked = 1; */ hw -- Dr. Heiner Wolf bluehands GmbH & Co.mmunication KG http://www.bluehands.de/people/hw +49 (0721) 16108 75 -- Jabber enabled Virtual Presence on the Web: www.lluna.de Open Source Future History: www.galactic-developments.de >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf >Of Heiner Wolf >Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 9:07 PM >To: Jabber software development list >Subject: RE: [jdev] MU-Conference returning "Not Found" > > >Hi, > >>Right. If you send a non-MUC enabled presence an unlocked instant room >>should be created for you if one does not exist. At least that's how I >>understand it (and how we implemented it as well). > >Since I am sending always a MUC-free <presence/>, I suppose >the "bug" is >that "some" unlocked instant rooms are locked accidently. Not as we >supposed before, that most locked rooms are accidently unlocked. >Question would then be how the component would "fall" into the room >locking fork instead of leaving it unlocked-instant? > >Is there any way to configure in the config file that only >unlocked-instant rooms will be created? > >I will try to reproduce the case but seems to be difficult. Most of my >rooms work. Happens only sometimes. > >hw >-- >Dr. Heiner Wolf >bluehands GmbH & Co.mmunication KG >http://www.bluehands.de/people/hw >+49 (0721) 16108 75 >-- >Jabber enabled Virtual Presence on the Web: www.lluna.de >Open Source Future History: www.galactic-developments.de > > > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf >Of JD Conley >Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 8:06 PM >To: Jabber software development list >Subject: RE: [jdev] MU-Conference returning "Not Found" > > >> My goal is very simple: send a <presence/> to create an open room >where >> everyone can join. >> >> Maybe the fact that is usally works is a bug. > >It sounds like it to me. > >> >> I was thinking that MUC is backward compatible to GroupChat. >If I send >a >> <presence/> without any mentioning of MUC, then I should get a room >> which is not locked until it is configured. > >... > >> No <x xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/muc'/>, no locking, right? > >Right. If you send a non-MUC enabled presence an unlocked instant room >should be created for you if one does not exist. At least that's how I >understand it (and how we implemented it as well). > >-JD >
