no, my point is it's not a photo, it's the hash of the photo. confusing if you just read the xml without reading the comments too.
On 10/18/05, Peter Saint-Andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Norman Rasmussen wrote: > > Apologies, perhaps it should have been called photohash instead, to > > avoid confusion? > > Isn't that what namespaces are for? ;-) > > Peter > > > > > -- - Norman Rasmussen - Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Home page: http://norman.rasmussen.co.za/
