-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jesus Cea wrote: > Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >>> Are you saying +1 to his question or +1 to XMPP-ID? :-) > > To "XMPP-ID". > >>> I see several reasons for Jabber-ID: > > Good enough. Point taken. > > May I suggest to document these reasons in the page?. I suppose it could > be a FAQ, sometime :-).
It already is! That and why not "X-Jabber-ID"??? :-) P - -- Peter Saint-Andre Jabber Software Foundation http://www.jabber.org/people/stpeter.shtml -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEBfMnNF1RSzyt3NURAjKtAJ9yjQtQD9OfWISs30seTbnZKxFxlQCg3nMo 19QDNcNzUXNaKyqdHjU9jcE= =QaIZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
