-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Trejkaz wrote: > On Thursday 06 April 2006 02:11, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >> Remko Troncon wrote: >>> we should make simple iq-based protocol for blocking and going >>> invisible, as a server-side profile of privacy lists. >> Yes, that's probably a good idea. Could be done with JEP-0050 I guess. > > Would it be possible to do this by adding convention on top of JEP-0126 > instead of defining a new command-based protocol? If we assume that a server > will auto-create the groups called "invisible" and "visible", then most of > the complexity for privacy lists go away.
Ah, that probably makes more sense, eh? > There is no recommended group name > for "visible-to-from" in the implementation notes, but surely this could be > added too. What is the point of hardcoding visible-to-from rule? AFAICS, that is no different from the visible rule (since you send presence only to people who have subscribed to you). But perhaps I'm missing something. :-) P - -- Peter Saint-Andre Jabber Software Foundation http://www.jabber.org/people/stpeter.shtml -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEND7zNF1RSzyt3NURAqidAKC7r2erTK1pnnzUHEmPXYQX5B3wigCcDR2T ph2W6CAU9dTqETlZenN39Kk= =K1fn -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
