Joonas Govenius wrote: > On 8/22/06, Michal vorner Vaner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The protocol itself does not limit the size, but allows servers to have >> their own limits for protection reasons. It however says the protocol is >> optimized for small stanzas. Recommended size is <4k for instant >> messaging. > > Has anyone actually tested this? Also, what's not "instant messaging"?
IIRC, we debated whether we wanted to recommend a maximum stanza size in RFC 3920 or RFC 3921, but decided against it. > I had to resort to transfering images in a very similar way to IBB > (JEP-0047) in my whiteboard solution. I'm encoding the image in base64 > and splitting the data over several messages if necessary. What > fragment size would you recommend in this case? I could imagine > sending a smallish, say 200KB, image in 4KB fragments causing much > more load on the server than sending it in 50KB fragments for example. > That's just my guess though. Does anyone know better? >From the perspective of XMPP messaging, 200K is not smallish. Perhaps some server developers could come up with recommended sizes as a best practice. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre Jabber Software Foundation http://www.jabber.org/people/stpeter.shtml
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
