Joe Hildebrand wrote: > > On Feb 6, 2008, at 5:02 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >> Yes, I think so. If only our remaining XMPP Council members would vote >> on it. :) > > > If only.
I'm working on 'em. ;-) > Another thing I mentioned to Gato, that should probably be said out > loud. Our implementation of PEP is going to assume that if you didn't > send a hash attribute, you aren't interested in any implicit PEP > subscriptions, so it never does a disco toward that client. Since there > really aren't many PEP clients yet, they will just have to implement > 115v1.5 at the same time they add PEP support. That seems reasonable to me. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
