On 2/28/08, Fabio Forno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 7:56 AM, Sergei Golovan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > It could be true if XMPP were defined as a XML subset in a consistent > > way (currently, XMPP doesn't require stream to be > > namesapce-well-formed, but allows to use XMLNS namespaces). > > > Not true: http://www.xmpp.org/rfcs/rfc3920.html paragraph 4.5
In paragraph 11.3 you could see that the only property which server must validate is XML well-formedness. So, it is perfectly acceptable for XMPP stream not to be namespace-well-formed as defined in http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-xml-names-19990114/ -- Sergei Golovan
