Stephan Maka wrote: > Hi there > > For a test suite, I am trying to reproduce the complex example from > XEP-0115 sect. 5.3. It doesn't work out so far: > > Why isn't the hidden field FORM_TYPE appended to S? Exclusion of > hidden fields is not mentioned.
it is appended, it's the first one > > Why do "http://jabber.org/protocol/caps " and > "http://jabber.org/protocol/muc " include a trailing white-space, > opposed to their representation in the Service Discovery result? I don't see any space, but I don't see where in the disco resutl there is cps support. It's not in the features. Why is it in the S string? I have another question about this example: how is it possible that the field ip_version which has no type (so should be considered as text-single according to XEP-0004) can have several <value> elements? -- Yann
