On Sun Jul 6 08:57:26 2008, Sander Devrieze wrote: > 2008/7/6 Remko Tronçon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> Coccinella also will change to use the "XMPP logo" as the bulb > is confusing. > > > > *Sigh*, another XMPP vs Jabber discussion, only this time > disguised in > > a logo discussion? Jabber vs. XMPP discussions never come to a > > conclusion, so I doubt that the 'Bulb logo' versus 'XMPP logo' > will > > come to an end. > > There's no need for a conclusion or a useless ongoing discussion: > Coccinella *is* moving to XMPP. AFAIR the process started about a > year > ago and so far no related usability troubles showed up. The XSF > Council didn't had any interested into making a decision about this > usability bug, even after I asked a few times, so we made the > decision > ourselves. Discussion closed. > > I'd have thought that rested very specifically with the board, not the council.
That said, how did you contact the council? I don't remember anything on the Council list, for example. > btw: XMPP banners are another thing on my TODO list (can take some > time!), I also already contacted the XSF Council about this matter, > but so far there is no feedback, again. So if nothing happens, there > will be a banner campaign using the XMPP logo by the Coccinella > project. Not as official as such a campaign by the XSF, but it makes > no sense to wait forever... Again, I don't personally recall any contact, so that would explain the lack of feedback on my part, at least... But again, this would be a board matter - you ought to re-raise this on the XSF's Members list, or send it to the XSF Board list directly. The Council is intended for technical matters, and what we call the protocol doesn't impact interoperability at all. Besides, the amount of waffling we do over stuff we're *meant* to be discussing is quite enough. Further discussion about what to call the protocol, what icon to use, etc, may invoke a total failure on my part to take anything seriously, for which I apologise in advance - Sander's suggestion that the XSF could do some more traditional advertising might, however, be a quite sensible thing to discuss. Dave. -- Dave Cridland - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - acap://acap.dave.cridland.net/byowner/user/dwd/bookmarks/ - http://dave.cridland.net/ Infotrope Polymer - ACAP, IMAP, ESMTP, and Lemonade _______________________________________________ JDev mailing list FAQ: http://www.jabber.org/discussion-lists/jdev-faq Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20 Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________
